Latest
Call for Papers: Vol. 42 closes 30 JuneNew: Quantum Security Summit registration openAxiom Standard 7042-2024 now ratifiedGrant cycle 2025 — $4.2M committedFellows election voting opens 15 JulyCall for Papers: Vol. 42 closes 30 JuneNew: Quantum Security Summit registration openAxiom Standard 7042-2024 now ratifiedGrant cycle 2025 — $4.2M committedFellows election voting opens 15 July
Digital Library

Research Archive

Search across 2.4 million peer-reviewed documents from journals, conferences, and standards.

Showing 2 of 2,418,902 results

Journal Article Open Access Data Engineering

Large-Scale Graph Neural Networks for Fraud Detection in Financial Transaction Networks: Architecture Design, Sampling Strategies, and Real-Time Inference at Billion-Edge Scale

Financial transaction networks -- in which nodes represent accounts and edges represent transactions -- exhibit graph-structural fraud patterns (ring networks, layering chains, velocity clustering) that are invisible to transaction-level classifiers but detectable through graph neural network architectures that aggregate multi-hop neighborhood information. This paper presents FraudGNN, a production-oriented Graph Neural Network system for real-time fraud detection at billion-edge transaction graph scale, and reports its design, training, and deployment experience at a large payments processor. FraudGNN employs GraphSAGE with neighbor sampling for scalable inductive inference, incorporating temporal edge features, account behavioral embeddings, and network centrality features into a heterogeneous graph transformer architecture. Key engineering contributions include a mini-batch training pipeline supporting 8-billion-edge graphs on 64-GPU clusters using gradient checkpointing and heterogeneous graph partitioning, and a real-time inference serving architecture that delivers GNN predictions within 45ms P99 latency for payment authorization decisions. FraudGNN achieves 94.3% AUC on a held-out fraud detection benchmark, representing an 8.7 percentage point improvement over the XGBoost baseline. We characterize the graph data pipeline engineering challenges -- including temporal graph construction, feature freshness management, and graph store selection -- that represent the majority of production deployment effort. This paper provides the most complete engineering treatment of production-scale GNN fraud detection systems published to date.

Obiora Eze, Kristina Nilsson, Takashi Morita, Yasmin El-Masri· May 2023· 389 citations
Journal Article Open Access Software Engineering

DevOps Team Topologies in Practice: Cross-Functional Team Design, Cognitive Load Management, and Interaction Mode Evolution in Scaling Engineering Organizations

Team Topologies, as proposed by Skelton and Pais (2019), has rapidly become an influential framework for organizing software engineering teams in DevOps contexts, yet empirical evidence of its application outcomes and adaptation challenges in real organizations remains sparse. This paper presents a longitudinal empirical study of Team Topologies adoption across 18 organizations ranging from 50 to 3,400 engineers, tracking team structure, interaction mode adherence, and delivery performance over 18 months through quarterly assessments. We operationalize the four team types — Stream-Aligned, Platform, Enabling, and Complicated Subsystem — and three interaction modes — Collaboration, X-as-a-Service, and Facilitating — as measurable constructs and instrument their presence and quality through a validated survey instrument we term the Team Topology Adherence Index (TTAI). Our analysis finds that Stream-Aligned teams with clear X-as-a-Service dependencies on Platform teams exhibit the highest delivery performance, but that this configuration requires Platform team maturity as a prerequisite — organizations that adopt the topology before Platform teams achieve self-service capability experience a net negative performance effect for 6–9 months. We identify the Cognitive Load Threshold as a predictive indicator of team restructuring need, and find that proactive team splitting triggered by cognitive load measures outperforms reactive splitting triggered by delivery slowdown by an average of 4.2 months.

Abiodun Ojo, Malin Persson, Takeshi Ikeda, Filipa Santos· May 2023· 378 citations