Latest
Call for Papers: Vol. 42 closes 30 JuneNew: Quantum Security Summit registration openAxiom Standard 7042-2024 now ratifiedGrant cycle 2025 — $4.2M committedFellows election voting opens 15 JulyCall for Papers: Vol. 42 closes 30 JuneNew: Quantum Security Summit registration openAxiom Standard 7042-2024 now ratifiedGrant cycle 2025 — $4.2M committedFellows election voting opens 15 July
Digital Library

Research Archive

Search across 2.4 million peer-reviewed documents from journals, conferences, and standards.

Showing 2 of 2,418,902 results

Journal Article Open Access Network Engineering

Intent-Based Networking with Large Language Models: Natural Language Network Policy Specification, Automated Configuration Generation, and Closed-Loop Verification in Enterprise Campus Networks

Intent-Based Networking (IBN) -- which allows network operators to specify desired network behavior in high-level business terms and rely on automation to translate intent into device configurations -- has been a long-standing aspiration of network management research. The emergence of large language models with strong natural language understanding and code generation capabilities has created new opportunities for practical IBN implementation without the manual ontology engineering that constrained earlier approaches. This paper presents NetIntent, an LLM-powered IBN framework that translates natural language network policy statements into vendor-agnostic network configuration artifacts (Ansible playbooks, Cisco IOS-XE, Juniper JunOS) with closed-loop verification against the deployed network state. NetIntent employs a three-stage pipeline: intent parsing and formalization using GPT-4o with network domain-adapted prompting, configuration synthesis using retrieval-augmented generation over a vendor configuration knowledge base, and automated verification using network simulation and configuration diffing. Evaluation is conducted across a 200-device enterprise campus network testbed spanning switching, routing, security policy, and QoS configuration domains. NetIntent correctly translates 87.4 percent of natural language policy statements into syntactically and semantically correct configurations, with the remaining 12.6 percent requiring human clarification due to intent ambiguity. Mean configuration generation time of 23 seconds compares favorably to a baseline of 47 minutes for manual configuration by experienced network engineers. We analyze the failure modes and introduce NetIntent-Guard, a post-generation policy correctness verifier reducing misconfiguration escape rate by 94 percent.

Chidiebere Eze, Maja Karlsson, Takeshi Yamamoto, Nadia Benali· Apr 2025· 98 citations
Journal Article Open Access Artificial Intelligence

AI-Driven Infrastructure Provisioning: Evaluating Natural Language to Infrastructure-as-Code Generation Using Large Language Models in DevOps Workflows

The application of large language models to Infrastructure as Code generation — enabling engineers to describe desired infrastructure in natural language and receive executable IaC manifests — represents a potentially transformative capability for DevOps productivity, but also introduces novel correctness, security, and auditability risks that have not been systematically evaluated. This paper presents the first rigorous empirical evaluation of natural language to IaC generation using GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro across a benchmark suite of 840 infrastructure provisioning tasks spanning AWS, Azure, and GCP in both Terraform HCL and Pulumi TypeScript. We evaluate generated configurations across five quality dimensions: syntactic correctness, semantic correctness (does the configuration provision what was requested?), security policy compliance (evaluated against CIS Benchmarks), idempotency, and cost efficiency. Across all models and providers, syntactic correctness averages 91.4%, but semantic correctness drops to 67.8%, with the most significant gaps occurring in complex networking, IAM policy generation, and multi-region configurations. Security policy compliance averages 54.2%, with IAM over-permissioning as the most prevalent deficiency. We introduce an LLM-IaC Quality Score (LIQS) aggregating all five dimensions and propose an LLM-Assisted IaC Workflow incorporating human review gates, automated compliance scanning, and policy-as-code validation to compensate for identified deficiencies. This work establishes the empirical baseline for safe LLM-assisted infrastructure provisioning in DevOps.

Ebuka Okonkwo, Hanna Björk, Daisuke Fujiwara, Rita Cardoso· Apr 2025· 142 citations