Latest
Call for Papers: Vol. 42 closes 30 JuneNew: Quantum Security Summit registration openAxiom Standard 7042-2024 now ratifiedGrant cycle 2025 — $4.2M committedFellows election voting opens 15 JulyCall for Papers: Vol. 42 closes 30 JuneNew: Quantum Security Summit registration openAxiom Standard 7042-2024 now ratifiedGrant cycle 2025 — $4.2M committedFellows election voting opens 15 July
Digital Library

Research Archive

Search across 2.4 million peer-reviewed documents from journals, conferences, and standards.

Showing 2 of 2,418,902 results

Journal Article Open Access Artificial Intelligence

DevOps in the Era of Generative AI: Reimagining Pipeline Automation, Incident Response, and Knowledge Management with Foundation Models

The rapid proliferation of generative AI foundation models — including large language models, code generation systems, and multimodal agents — is poised to fundamentally reshape DevOps practice across the software delivery lifecycle. This paper presents a horizon study examining how generative AI is being integrated into DevOps toolchains in 2024–2025, synthesizing evidence from 23 practitioner organizations, 41 tool vendor disclosures, and a systematic review of 67 preprint and published studies. We identify six primary integration points at which generative AI is creating substantive capability shifts: automated pipeline configuration generation, natural language infrastructure querying, incident narrative summarization, postmortem synthesis, documentation generation from codebase context, and intelligent on-call assistant agents. Through structured case analysis, we find that organizations deploying GenAI-augmented incident response workflows reduce average time-to-mitigation by 34% and decrease escalation rates by 28%. We introduce the GenAI-DevOps Integration Maturity Model (GDIMM), which characterizes organizational readiness across five levels from ad-hoc LLM use to fully agentic delivery pipelines. We also surface emerging risks — including prompt injection in CI/CD contexts, over-reliance on LLM-generated runbooks, and governance gaps in AI-generated infrastructure code — and propose mitigation design patterns. This paper provides the most comprehensive empirical and conceptual treatment of the GenAI-DevOps intersection to date.

Chukwuemeka Obialo, Nina Brandt, Yuki Hashimoto, Rania Saleh· Jan 2025· 274 citations
Journal Article Open Access Augmented and Virtual Reality

Spatial Computing Interfaces for Collaborative Engineering Design: Task Performance, Cognitive Load, and Design Outcome Quality in Mixed Reality Versus Traditional CAD Workflows

Spatial computing platforms -- particularly mixed reality (MR) headsets such as the Apple Vision Pro and Microsoft HoloLens 2 -- have been proposed as transformative tools for engineering design collaboration, enabling co-located and remote teams to interact with three-dimensional CAD models in their physical workspace context. Despite significant industry investment, rigorous empirical evidence comparing MR-assisted design workflows to established 2D screen-based CAD collaboration on task performance, cognitive load, and design outcome quality remains scarce. This paper presents a mixed-methods study combining a within-subjects randomized controlled experiment (n=84 engineers across mechanical, architectural, and product design specialties) with qualitative protocol analysis to evaluate MR versus screen-based CAD collaboration across three design task categories: design review and defect identification, assembly sequence planning, and cross-functional stakeholder communication. MR collaboration reduces defect identification time by 34 percent and increases defect detection rate by 22 percent for complex assembly structures compared to screen-based review, driven by improved spatial reference frame sharing. For assembly sequence planning, MR achieves equivalent outcome quality with 18 percent lower task completion time. However, MR imposes significantly higher cognitive load (NASA-TLX increase of 31 percent) during text-heavy annotation tasks due to current headset text input limitations. We develop the Spatial Computing Task Suitability Matrix (SCSM) mapping engineering task types to expected MR benefit, and provide evidence-grounded adoption guidance for engineering organizations evaluating spatial computing investments.

Adaeze Nwachukwu, Erik Svensson, Akira Mori, Diana Rodrigues· Jan 2025· 112 citations